Nevada adopts a comprehensive, risk-focused approach to security for cannabis distributors—focusing heavily on electronic monitoring, perimeter controls, and trained personnel. While armed guards are not mandated by state law, all distributors must implement robust security systems and follow strict training and oversight requirements.

State-Mandated Infrastructure & Monitoring

Under Nevada’s Cannabis Compliance Regulations (NCCR) (Regulation 6.085), every cannabis distributor must:

• Maintain one single secure entrance;
• Prevent visibility of cannabis products from outside;
• Install intrusion-detection systems, exterior lighting, and 24/7 video surveillance with strict resolution and coverage requirements, including vaults and retail points-of-sale.
• Provide automatic alerts to law enforcement for unauthorized breaches;
• Store recordings for at least 30 days with backup power and notification systems for failures.

These measures apply to both cultivation and distribution facilities and are required irrespective of whether third-party or in-house security is used.

Personnel Protocols & Training Requirements

NCCR also mandates:

• Employment of a security manager or director responsible for biannual security audits, employee training, and vetting third-party security.
• All security personnel—including third-party hires—must complete specified training within three months: theft prevention, emergency response, appropriate use of force, first aid/CPR, crime-scene protection, access control, eight hours of on-site training, and eight hours of classroom instruction.

These requirements apply equally to unarmed and armed staff. There is no distinction in training based on whether the guard carries a weapon.

Armed vs. Unarmed Security: Optional, Not Required

Nevada regulations require security measures but do not require armed guards. Companies can choose unarmed or armed personnel based on their own risk assessments and business strategy. However, many licensees opt for a layered security model—with trained unarmed guards supported by robust electronic systems.

Importantly, armed guards must comply with federal law: under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), individuals who use marijuana—even under medical or recreational laws—are barred from possessing firearms. Thus, any criminal background or recent marijuana use disqualifies personnel from being armed, adding a layer of complexity to hiring.

Employer Policies & Drug-Free Requirements

Employers in this sector frequently implement drug-free workplace policies for security staff, especially if armed. Nevada law (NRS 678D.510) permits employers to enforce such policies, including drug testing, despite the legality of recreational marijuana.

For companies employing armed security, enforcing zero-tolerance for marijuana use is essential—not only to comply with federal law but also to ensure in-house qualifications are maintained.

Local Jurisdictions & Industry Best Practices

Las Vegas and Clark County incorporate state regulations into local licensing codes (e.g., LVMC 6.95), requiring adherence to all state security provisions. Vendors and licensees often go beyond baseline requirements by integrating armed personnel—especially during transport or in high-risk facilities.

Key Takeaway

• Armed security is optional, not legally required.
• Robust electronic systems, secure premises, and trained personnel are mandatory.
• Armed guards must be drug-free and meet federal standards.
• Individual companies decide on armed vs. unarmed models based on risk analysis, insurance, and cost.
• Independent vendors offering security services must be vetted and qualified per state standards.

By combining mandated physical infrastructure and monitoring with professional, trained personnel—whether armed or unarmed—licensed cannabis distributors in Nevada can fulfill regulatory requirements and mitigate security risks. Companies must also balance internal policies, federal firearm restrictions, and local licensing demands when choosing their security architecture.